2181
SELECT GETDATE()

Returns: 2008-09-22 15:24:13.790

I want that date part without the time part: 2008-09-22 00:00:00.000

How can I get that?

9

47 Answers 47

2848

NOTE: This answer returns the original DATETIME or DATETIME2 type. For an expression that returns a true DATE type (SQL Server 2008 and later), see BenR's answer below.

SELECT DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, @your_date))

for example

SELECT DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, GETDATE()))

gives me

2008-09-22 00:00:00.000

Pros:

  • No varchar<->datetime conversions required
  • No need to think about locale
14
  • 64
    +1 Looks like this one is 35% faster than the double convert() method commonly used (which I also have used for years). Nice one.
    – Dane
    Sep 22, 2008 at 4:04
  • 8
    The only downside I can see to your solution is that unless you know what it is doing it is a bit obtuse. Using the double convert method makes your intentions more obvious to futire code maintainers. BTW I have not downvoted you. I think I'll start using your method too. Thankyou @aku Sep 24, 2008 at 8:25
  • 41
    @pilavdzice Setting a datetime to midnight of that day does LEAVE OFF THE TIME. What result are you expecting? The datetime data type cannot have no time at all. I think you are confusing data storage with user presentation. If all you want is a way to show a user a string that has no time portion (not zeroes, just blanks) then you simply want Convert(varchar(30), @Date, 101) or something similar. See SQL Server Books Online • Cast and Convert for more info.
    – ErikE
    Aug 17, 2012 at 22:03
  • 8
    @user1671639 the datetime data type always contains both a date and a time, you can't sensibly store one without the other - unless you're using SQL Server 2008, in which case there are also separate 'date' and 'time' data types. If you use CONVERT() like that, you really want a string for later use, so you'll be stuck doing it like that - although it'd be better if you used date formatting functions instead of cutting the date off - or via CAST(... AS DATE) or CONVERT(DATE, ...), which has been mentioned quite often on this very page.
    – Magnus
    Jun 21, 2013 at 15:08
  • 12
    I recommend changing the answer to SELECT DATEADD(dd, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, @your_date), 0) because then dd can be swapped out for any other datepart keyword to truncate your datetime at an arbitrary level. Aug 14, 2014 at 16:08
955
+500

SQLServer 2008 now has a 'date' data type which contains only a date with no time component. Anyone using SQLServer 2008 and beyond can do the following:

SELECT CONVERT(date, GETDATE())
5
  • 48
    There is also the 'time' data type in SQL2008 which answers the other half of the question of separating date and time. Aug 25, 2011 at 0:01
  • 10
    FYI, I benchmarked different methods of trimming off time from dates and this was the fastest method. Granted the difference was small, but it was clearly faster over a large # of executions. Jul 3, 2014 at 12:48
  • 2
    wt about sqlserver 2005??
    – Dr. MAF
    Nov 19, 2015 at 9:10
  • @Dr.MAF Completing the circle, the pre-2008 answer is here: stackoverflow.com/questions/113045/…
    – Frosty840
    Jul 31, 2017 at 7:24
  • In SQL 2019, what is preferred - this answer or CAST or CONVERT?
    – variable
    Feb 2, 2022 at 6:26
243

If using SQL 2008 and above:

select cast(getdate() as date)
13
  • 3
    @FredrickGauss: What type, Date? What version of SQL Server do you use? Dec 13, 2012 at 20:01
  • 8
    Beware! declare @date1 datetime = '2015-09-30 20:59:59.999'; select cast(@date1 as date) returns '2015-10-01'
    – Nick
    Sep 24, 2015 at 19:18
  • 8
    @Nick: this is the issue with DateTime. use DateTime2 instead and it works fine. sqlfiddle.com/#!6/9eecb7/2833 Sep 25, 2015 at 1:33
  • 10
    @Nick, to complement abatishchev response, your @date1 is indeed 2015-10-01, due to DateTime limitations. Try without any cast to Date, it yields 2015-10-01too! declare @date1 datetime = '2015-09-30 23:59:59.999';select @date1 => 2015-10-01
    – Frédéric
    Dec 11, 2015 at 17:07
  • 5
    One of these easy to remember SQL tricks. As Mike says, only 2008 onward but, if you find a 2005 and previous DB somewhere, you may have a lot of issues :)
    – NicVerAZ
    Dec 29, 2015 at 17:04
88

DATEADD and DATEDIFF are better than CONVERTing to varchar. Both queries have the same execution plan, but execution plans are primarily about data access strategies and do not always reveal implicit costs involved in the CPU time taken to perform all the pieces. If both queries are run against a table with millions of rows, the CPU time using DateDiff can be close to 1/3rd of the Convert CPU time!

To see execution plans for queries:

set showplan_text on
GO 

Both DATEADD and DATEDIFF will execute a CONVERT_IMPLICIT.

Although the CONVERT solution is simpler and easier to read for some, it is slower. There is no need to cast back to DateTime (this is implicitly done by the server). There is also no real need in the DateDiff method for DateAdd afterward as the integer result will also be implicitly converted back to DateTime.


SELECT CONVERT(varchar, MyDate, 101) FROM DatesTable

  |--Compute Scalar(DEFINE:([Expr1004]=CONVERT(varchar(30),[TEST].[dbo].[DatesTable].[MyDate],101)))
       |--Table Scan(OBJECT:([TEST].[dbo].[DatesTable]))

SELECT DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, MyDate)) FROM DatesTable

  |--Compute Scalar(DEFINE:([Expr1004]=dateadd(day,(0),CONVERT_IMPLICIT(datetime,datediff(day,'1900-01-01 00:00:00.000',CONVERT_IMPLICIT(datetime,[TEST].[dbo].[DatesTable].[MyDate],0)),0))))
       |--Table Scan(OBJECT:([TEST].[dbo].[DatesTable]))

Using FLOOR() as @digi suggested has performance closer to DateDiff, but is not recommended as casting the DateTime data type to float and back does not always yield the original value.

Remember guys: Don't believe anyone. Look at the performance statistics, and test it yourself!

Be careful when you're testing your results. Selecting many rows to the client will hide the performance difference because it takes longer to send the rows over the network than it does to perform the calculations. So make sure that the work for all the rows is done by the server but there is no row set sent to the client.

There seems to be confusion for some people about when cache optimization affects queries. Running two queries in the same batch or in separate batches has no effect on caching. So you can either expire the cache manually or simply run the queries back and forth multiple times. Any optimization for query #2 would also affect any subsequent queries, so throw out execution #1 if you like.

Here is full test script and performance results that prove DateDiff is substantially faster than converting to varchar.

5
  • Ricardo C, nice investigation! What version of SQL server do you use? On MSSQL2000 method with datediff performs slightly faster for me.
    – aku
    Sep 24, 2008 at 5:29
  • Just to note, I performed test 1000.000 times. For real-world scenarios performance difference will not be noticeable, I guess
    – aku
    Sep 24, 2008 at 5:30
  • Aku, I used SQL Server 2005 Express for this test. I work on 2000 at work, and I will test it with a table with over 24 million rows and see what comes out of it.
    – Ricardo C
    Sep 24, 2008 at 6:20
  • Aku, same results. No difference in performance over ten million rows.
    – Ricardo C
    Sep 25, 2008 at 3:41
  • 7
    The claims about equal performance are not true. Of course the execution plans will be the same!!! Measuring performance on these MUST be done by comparing CPU usage, not examining execution plans.
    – ErikE
    Sep 12, 2010 at 23:01
64

Try this:

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),GETDATE(),111)

The above statement converts your current format to YYYY/MM/DD, please refer to this link to choose your preferable format.

3
  • 5
    This returns '2008/09/22' for me Sep 22, 2008 at 3:41
  • 3
    SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),GETDATE(),101) is mm/dd/yyyy format.
    – Flea
    Jul 10, 2013 at 20:47
  • 5
    if you're sorting based on the raw text value (outside of the DB) then the 'japanese' format is better Sep 14, 2013 at 0:34
51
SELECT CONVERT(datetime, CONVERT(varchar, GETDATE(), 101))
32

Just do:

SELECT CAST(date_variable AS date)

or with with PostgreSQL:

SELECT date_variable::date

This is called typecasting btw!

30

For return in date format

CAST(OrderDate AS date)

The above code will work in sql server 2010

It will return like 12/12/2013

For SQL Server 2012 use the below code

CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), OrderDate , 111)
6
  • 1
    This returns me date with zero time, not just date
    – Bohemian
    Jan 5, 2014 at 13:09
  • 1
    can i know which version if sql server you are using?
    – Mahesh ML
    Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15
  • 1
    @MaheshML it returns both date and time in MS SQL 2012.
    – Marek
    Apr 13, 2014 at 15:50
  • 1
    Works like a charm in SQL Azure May 21, 2014 at 15:01
  • 5
    @MaheshML There is no such thing as SQL Server 2010. Sep 25, 2017 at 2:22
26

You can use the CONVERT function to return only the date. See the link(s) below:

Date and Time Manipulation in SQL Server 2000

CAST and CONVERT

The syntax for using the convert function is:

CONVERT ( data_type [ ( length ) ] , expression [ , style ] ) 
24

If you need the result as a varchar, you should go through

SELECT CONVERT(DATE, GETDATE()) --2014-03-26
SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), GETDATE(), 111) --2014/03/26

which is already mentioned above.

If you need result in date and time format, you should use any of the queries below

  1. SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME, CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), GETDATE(), 111)) AS OnlyDate 
    

    2014-03-26 00:00:00.000

  2. SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME, CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), GETDATE(), 112)) AS OnlyDate 
    

    2014-03-26 00:00:00.000

  3. DECLARE  @OnlyDate DATETIME
    SET @OnlyDate = DATEDIFF(DD, 0, GETDATE())
    SELECT @OnlyDate AS OnlyDate
    

    2014-03-26 00:00:00.000

23

If you are using SQL Server 2012 or above versions,

Use Format() function.

There are already multiple answers and formatting types for SQL server. But most of the methods are somewhat ambiguous and it would be difficult for you to remember the numbers for format type or functions with respect to Specific Date Format. That's why in next versions of SQL server there is better option.

FORMAT ( value, format [, culture ] )

Culture option is very useful, as you can specify date as per your viewers.

You have to remember d (for small patterns) and D (for long patterns).

1."d" - Short date pattern.

2009-06-15T13:45:30 -> 6/15/2009 (en-US)
2009-06-15T13:45:30 -> 15/06/2009 (fr-FR)
2009-06-15T13:45:30 -> 2009/06/15 (ja-JP)

2."D" - Long date pattern.

2009-06-15T13:45:30 -> Monday, June 15, 2009 (en-US)
2009-06-15T13:45:30 -> 15 июня 2009 г. (ru-RU)
2009-06-15T13:45:30 -> Montag, 15. Juni 2009 (de-DE)

More examples in query.

DECLARE @d DATETIME = '10/01/2011';
SELECT FORMAT ( @d, 'd', 'en-US' ) AS 'US English Result'
      ,FORMAT ( @d, 'd', 'en-gb' ) AS 'Great Britain English Result'
      ,FORMAT ( @d, 'd', 'de-de' ) AS 'German Result'
      ,FORMAT ( @d, 'd', 'zh-cn' ) AS 'Simplified Chinese (PRC) Result'; 

SELECT FORMAT ( @d, 'D', 'en-US' ) AS 'US English Result'
      ,FORMAT ( @d, 'D', 'en-gb' ) AS 'Great Britain English Result'
      ,FORMAT ( @d, 'D', 'de-de' ) AS 'German Result'
      ,FORMAT ( @d, 'D', 'zh-cn' ) AS 'Chinese (Simplified PRC) Result';

US English Result Great Britain English Result  German Result Simplified Chinese (PRC) Result
----------------  ----------------------------- ------------- -------------------------------------
10/1/2011         01/10/2011                    01.10.2011    2011/10/1

US English Result            Great Britain English Result  German Result                    Chinese (Simplified PRC) Result
---------------------------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------  ---------------------------------------
Saturday, October 01, 2011   01 October 2011               Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011        2011年10月1日

If you want more formats, you can go to:

  1. Standard Date and Time Format Strings
  2. Custom Date and Time Format Strings
2
  • To skip the culture, the custom formats lets you set your own, e.g. FORMAT (@d, 'yyyyy-MM-dd') to get 2011-10-11.
    – ourmandave
    Jan 7, 2021 at 13:43
  • Using FORMAT in any case in SQL Server is at least 20 times slower than even some of the craziest conversions that you can think of. I'd stay away from it for everything.
    – Jeff Moden
    May 5, 2022 at 4:02
18

Using FLOOR() - just cut time part.

SELECT CAST(FLOOR(CAST(GETDATE() AS FLOAT)) AS DATETIME)
1
  • 4
    This method is not the fastest, and also implicitly teaches people that casting dates to float is accurate, which it is not. Please see this post for more detail.
    – ErikE
    Sep 12, 2010 at 23:16
18
SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(DAY,-1,GETDATE()),103) --21/09/2011

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(DAY,-1,GETDATE()),101) --09/21/2011

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(DAY,-1,GETDATE()),111) --2011/09/21

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(DAY,-1,GETDATE()),107) --Sep 21, 2011
0
16
SELECT DATEADD(DD, DATEDIFF(DD, 0, GETDATE()), 0)

SELECT DATEADD(DAY, 0, DATEDIFF(DAY,0, GETDATE()))

SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME, CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), GETDATE(), 101))

Edit: The first two methods are essentially the same, and out perform the convert to varchar method.

3
  • 1
    These methods are all great, but which single one do you suggest using? Sep 22, 2008 at 3:48
  • 3
    Note that the "correct" version of the top two is select dateadd(dd, datediff(dd, 0, getdate()), 0), because the dds can then be swapped out for any of the datepart keywords to clip the date at any segment you choose. (Also note that dd is just an abbreviation for day.) Aug 14, 2014 at 16:02
  • be aware, that with the new DATETIME2 this truncation doesn't work every time correctly: DECLARE @myDate DATETIME2 = '2020-12-31 23:59:59.998911'; SELECT @myDate AS orig_date, DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, @myDate)) AS truncated_date It results as orig_date: 2020-12-31 23:59:59.9989110 truncated_date: 2021-01-01 00:00:00.000
    – Tom BK Cz
    Apr 19, 2023 at 22:24
15

IF you want to use CONVERT and get the same output as in the original question posed, that is, yyyy-mm-dd then use CONVERT(varchar(10),[SourceDate as dateTime],121) same code as the previous couple answers, but the code to convert to yyyy-mm-dd with dashes is 121.

If I can get on my soapbox for a second, this kind of formatting doesn't belong in the data tier, and that's why it wasn't possible without silly high-overhead 'tricks' until SQL Server 2008 when actual datepart data types are introduced. Making such conversions in the data tier is a huge waste of overhead on your DBMS, but more importantly, the second you do something like this, you have basically created in-memory orphaned data that I assume you will then return to a program. You can't put it back in to another 3NF+ column or compare it to anything typed without reverting, so all you've done is introduced points of failure and removed relational reference.

You should ALWAYS go ahead and return your dateTime data type to the calling program and in the PRESENTATION tier, make whatever adjustments are necessary. As soon as you go converting things before returning them to the caller, you are removing all hope of referential integrity from the application. This would prevent an UPDATE or DELETE operation, again, unless you do some sort of manual reversion, which again is exposing your data to human/code/gremlin error when there is no need.

6
  • 1
    Except, say, if you want a query that retrieves all records matching a user-supplied date as the date-part of a certain time field. Good luck doing that only in the presentation layer. (You don't need convert, you can can use date arithmetic, but you get the idea…) Mar 14, 2013 at 16:42
  • 1
    @Andrew why does that matter? You say WHERE col >= @Date AND col < DATEADD(DAY, 1, @Date); - there is absolutely no reason to strip time from the column. Nov 16, 2013 at 5:09
  • 1
    @AaronBertrand That only works assuming the input @Date has a zero time part. In case that isn't true, you still need to know how to truncate times server-side. I agree with this answer that formatting should be left to the presentation layer, but I didn't agree with an implication that leaving that for the front end means you don't have to know a quick way to truncate. Nov 16, 2013 at 17:04
  • 1
    @Andrew all you have to do is make the input parameter DATE. My point is still that you should never have to apply any such truncation to the column, even though that is most people's first instinct. Nov 16, 2013 at 20:25
  • 1
    @AaronBertrand and that assumes you have control over the datatype of the parameter. Fine in a stored procedure, not so possible in other situations. Why not cast to be sure the parameter is the type you want and need? Nov 18, 2013 at 23:42
15

To obtain the result indicated, I use the following command.

SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,CONVERT(DATE,GETDATE()))

I holpe it is useful.

13

Date:

SELECT CONVERT(date, GETDATE())
SELECT CAST(GETDATE() as date)

Time:

SELECT CONVERT(time , GETDATE() , 114)
SELECT CAST(GETDATE() as time)
12

If you are assigning the results to a column or variable, give it the DATE type, and the conversion is implicit.

DECLARE @Date DATE = GETDATE()   

SELECT @Date   --> 2017-05-03
11
 Convert(nvarchar(10), getdate(), 101) --->  5/12/14

 Convert(nvarchar(12), getdate(), 101) --->  5/12/2014
11

Syntax:

SELECT CONVERT (data_type(length)),Date, DateFormatCode)

Ex:

Select CONVERT(varchar,GETDATE(),1) as [MM/DD/YY]
Select CONVERT(varchar,GETDATE(),2) as [YY.MM.DD]

all dateformatcodes about Date:

DateFormatCode  Format
1       [MM/DD/YY]
2       [YY.MM.DD]
3       [DD/MM/YY]
4       [DD.MM.YY]
5       [DD-MM-YY]
6       [DD MMM YY]
7       [MMM DD,YY]
10      [MM-DD-YY]
11      [YY/MM/DD]
12      [YYMMDD]
23      [yyyy-mm-dd]
101     [MM/DD/YYYY]
102     [YYYY.MM.DD]
103     [DD/MM/YYYY]
104     [DD/MM/YYYY]
105     [DD/MM/YYYY]
106     [DD MMM YYYY]
107     [MMM DD,YYYY]
110     [MM-DD-YYYY]
111     [YYYY/MM/DD]
112     [YYYYMMDD]
1
  • +1 for the neat info (maybe not performance optimized but clear and useful). It would be even better if you could post a link to the reference for the conversion codes. Optimally, if possible, present a way to pick ones own, customizable format (e.g. how to get dd-yy-mm) as well as incorporating the time part in the format (e.g. how to get yyyy-hh-ss, however weird that would be). Aug 7, 2022 at 6:27
9

Simply you can do this way:

SELECT CONVERT(date, getdate())
SELECT DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, @your_date))
SELECT DATEADD(dd, 0, DATEDIFF(dd, 0, GETDATE()))

Outputs as:

2008-09-22 00:00:00.000

Or simply do like this:

SELECT CONVERT (DATE, GETDATE()) 'Date Part Only'

Result:

Date Part Only
--------------
2013-07-14
0
9

In this case, date only, you we are gonna run this query:

SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), getdate(), 111);enter image description here

0
8

I think this would work in your case:

CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),Person.DateOfBirth,111) AS BirthDate
//here date is obtained as 1990/09/25
8
DECLARE @yourdate DATETIME = '11/1/2014 12:25pm'    
SELECT CONVERT(DATE, @yourdate)
1
  • 2
    This suggestion has been covered by other answers (more than once).
    – Andriy M
    Nov 19, 2014 at 21:47
8

Okay, Though I'm bit late :), Here is the another solution.

SELECT CAST(FLOOR(CAST(GETDATE() AS FLOAT)) as DATETIME)

Result

2008-09-22 00:00:00.000

And if you are using SQL Server 2012 and higher then you can use FORMAT() function like this -

SELECT FORMAT(GETDATE(), 'yyyy-MM-dd')
1
  • Your first example still has a time component. The point of the question was how to remove that.
    – Zack
    Apr 20, 2016 at 21:20
8

Starting from SQL SERVER 2012, you can do this:

SELECT FORMAT(GETDATE(), 'yyyy-MM-dd 00:00:00.000')

0
7

Even using the ancient MSSQL Server 7.0, the code here (courtesy of this link) allowed me to get whatever date format I was looking for at the time:

PRINT '1) Date/time in format MON DD YYYY HH:MI AM (OR PM): ' + CONVERT(CHAR(19),GETDATE())  
PRINT '2) Date/time in format MM-DD-YY: ' + CONVERT(CHAR(8),GETDATE(),10)  
PRINT '3) Date/time in format MM-DD-YYYY: ' + CONVERT(CHAR(10),GETDATE(),110) 
PRINT '4) Date/time in format DD MON YYYY: ' + CONVERT(CHAR(11),GETDATE(),106)
PRINT '5) Date/time in format DD MON YY: ' + CONVERT(CHAR(9),GETDATE(),6) 
PRINT '6) Date/time in format DD MON YYYY HH:MM:SS:MMM(24H): ' + CONVERT(CHAR(24),GETDATE(),113)

It produced this output:

1) Date/time in format MON DD YYYY HH:MI AM (OR PM): Feb 27 2015  1:14PM
2) Date/time in format MM-DD-YY: 02-27-15
3) Date/time in format MM-DD-YYYY: 02-27-2015
4) Date/time in format DD MON YYYY: 27 Feb 2015
5) Date/time in format DD MON YY: 27 Feb 15
6) Date/time in format DD MON YYYY HH:MM:SS:MMM(24H): 27 Feb 2015 13:14:46:630
6

why don't you use DATE_FORMAT( your_datetiem_column, '%d-%m-%Y' ) ?

EX: select DATE_FORMAT( some_datetime_column, '%d-%m-%Y' ) from table_name

you can change sequence of m,d and year by re-arranging '%d-%m-%Y' part

6

I know this is old, but I do not see where anyone stated it this way. From what I can tell, this is ANSI standard.

SELECT CAST(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP AS DATE)

It would be good if Microsoft could also support the ANSI standard CURRENT_DATE variable.

3
  • select {fn current_date()} as today works for me.
    – brianary
    Dec 2, 2019 at 18:26
  • @brianary - That's nice, but it is not ANSI SQL.
    – lit
    Dec 8, 2019 at 17:28
  • That's fair enough, and your answer is nicely portable, but I figured as long as we're working around T-SQL, this also works (and shows that implementing ANSI CURRENT_DATE would be trivial for MS).
    – brianary
    Dec 8, 2019 at 18:28
6

I favor the following which wasn't mentioned:

DATEFROMPARTS(DATEPART(yyyy, @mydatetime), DATEPART(mm, @mydatetime), DATEPART(dd, @mydatetime))

It also doesn't care about local or do a double convert -- although each 'datepart' probably does math. So it may be a little slower than the datediff method, but to me it is much more clear. Especially when I want to group by just the year and month (set the day to 1).

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.